Live network mapping and remediation prioritization
Live network mapping visualizes systems and their connections from real telemetry, so the map reflects what is actually communicating now rather than a hand-drawn diagram. Remediation prioritization ranks findings by risk — scoring each by exploitability, blast radius, and dollar impact so teams fix what matters most first, with change previews and approval gates keeping every action controlled.
Two problems sit at opposite ends of the same workflow. At the start, teams can't see their environment clearly, because the map is stale. At the end, they can't act on what they find fast enough, because remediation is a backlog of disconnected tickets. Live mapping and remediation prioritization address both ends of that loop.
What makes a map 'live'
A static map is drawn once and decays. A live map is driven by telemetry: connections appear because traffic is actually observed between systems, lines fade as activity decays, and elements recolor when behavior looks anomalous. The result is closer to an operations-center view of current reality than to documentation.
Where the data comes from
A live map is only as good as its inputs. Telemetry generally arrives two ways: pushed from systems that stream events, and pulled by collectors that query systems on a schedule. Common collection methods include:
- Streaming/push pipelines for high-volume event data.
- REST and SSH collectors for application and host data.
- SNMP for network device metrics.
- osquery for detailed host and endpoint facts.
Prioritizing what to fix first
Seeing a problem is only half the job. Prioritization turns a list of findings into a ranked plan: the system scores each issue by exploitability, blast radius, and dollar impact against the live twin, then shows a preview of the proposed change and its risk. Approvals gate anything consequential, and every action is recorded in a tamper-evident audit trail.
The aim is focus without recklessness — teams spend their time on the fixes that reduce the most risk, while keeping a human in the loop where the stakes are high.
How Onek maps and remediates
Onek's map reads from the same telemetry that builds the twin, and its remediation layer closes the loop with control built in.
Available today
- A live map whose connection lines react to observed traffic and recolor on anomalies.
- Unified push and pull collectors (streaming, REST, SSH, SNMP, osquery).
- Risk-scored remediation prioritization with change previews, approval gates, and policy guardrails on anything consequential.
- A hash-chained audit trail of every change.
On the roadmap
- Continuous re-ranking of remediation priorities as the twin and threat picture change.
Frequently asked questions
- What is a live network map?
- A live network map visualizes systems and their connections using real telemetry, updating as traffic changes. Connections reflect what is actually communicating, activity fades over time, and elements highlight when behavior looks anomalous — unlike a static diagram that is drawn once and goes stale.
- How does Onek prioritize remediation?
- Onek turns a backlog of findings into a ranked plan. It scores each issue by exploitability, blast radius, and dollar impact against the live twin, so teams fix what reduces the most risk first — with change previews, approval gates, and a tamper-evident audit trail keeping every action controlled and auditable.
- How does Onek keep remediation controlled?
- Every recommended change comes with a preview and a risk score, consequential actions require approval, and each action is captured in a tamper-evident audit trail — so teams move fast on what matters without losing oversight.
Related platform capabilities
Learn the concepts
